PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCJ vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCJ achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.


MYCJ

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCJ
State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
0.23%8.32%-2.26%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCJ and SPYG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.17

The correlation between MYCJ and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCJ vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCJ
MYCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MYCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCJSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.48

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

10.25

-1.68

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCJ and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCJSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.12

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.35

+0.63

Drawdowns

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCJ drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCJ and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCJSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-67.63%

+64.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-13.76%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.13%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-24.33%

+23.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

3.32%

-2.73%

Volatility

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) is 0.90%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that MYCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCJSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

4.35%

-3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

12.46%

-10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

16.06%

-13.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.65%

21.17%

-17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

20.64%

-16.99%

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCJ vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

MYCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MYCJ
State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
4.65%4.68%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCJ and SPYG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to MYCJ (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCJ dropped -3.29% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 1-year performance, SPYG leads with 33.95% vs 5.01% for MYCJ. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MYCJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 33.95% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCJ.

MYCJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

MYCJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SPYG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCJ and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCJ and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer