PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIHX vs. DFAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) and DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIHX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than DFAAX's 2.75% return.


MXIHX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*

DFAAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.96%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MXIHX
Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
0.65%6.75%2.80%4.76%-8.95%3.57%
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
2.75%5.18%4.41%9.49%-13.40%20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIHX and DFAAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.77

The correlation between MXIHX and DFAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIHX vs. DFAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIHX
MXIHX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MXIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAAX
DFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) and DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIHXDFAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.76

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

6.16

+1.19

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the DFAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIHX and DFAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIHX drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum DFAAX drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIHX and DFAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIHXDFAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-16.64%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-2.55%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.86%

-3.44%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.51%

-16.64%

+5.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.30%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-4.51%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.72%

-0.22%

Volatility

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) at 0.97%. This indicates that MXIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIHXDFAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.97%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

2.28%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

3.10%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.85%

8.37%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

8.29%

-3.92%

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAAX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIHX vs. DFAAX - Dividend Comparison

MXIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than DFAAX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
3.38%2.90%4.09%3.96%2.06%13.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MXIHX
Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
3.59%3.61%3.60%4.22%8.49%3.05%2.01%1.51%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIHX and DFAAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIHX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to DFAAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIHX dropped -11.51% vs DFAAX's -16.64%.

DFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIHX and DFAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer