PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAAX vs. RRPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAAX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than RRPAX's 1.11% return.


DFAAX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.44%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*

RRPAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
2.44%5.18%4.41%9.49%-13.40%20.47%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.11%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAAX and RRPAX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between DFAAX and RRPAX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAAX vs. RRPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAAX
DFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAAXRRPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.68

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

13.75

-8.33

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the RRPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAAX and RRPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAAX drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, roughly equal to the maximum RRPAX drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAAX and RRPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAAXRRPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-16.15%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-0.95%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.44%

-1.89%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-6.48%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.95%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-2.94%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.25%

+0.47%

Volatility

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) at 0.81%. This indicates that DFAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RRPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAAXRRPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.81%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

1.45%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

1.91%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.37%

3.24%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.28%

2.70%

+5.58%

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RRPAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAAX vs. RRPAX - Dividend Comparison

DFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than RRPAX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
3.39%2.90%4.09%3.96%2.06%13.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
3.96%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAAX and RRPAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAAX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to RRPAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAAX dropped -16.64% vs RRPAX's -16.15%.

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAAX and RRPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer