MXIHX vs. MXGMX
MXIHX (Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund) and MXGMX (Great-West U.S. Government Securities Fund) are both mutual funds - MXIHX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Great-West Funds, while MXGMX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Great-West Funds. Over the past 5 years, MXIHX returned 1.80%/yr vs -0.31%/yr for MXGMX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXIHX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for MXGMX.
Performance
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXIHX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than MXGMX's 0.27% return.
MXIHX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- —
MXGMX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIHX Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund | 0.65% | 6.75% | 2.80% | 4.76% | -8.95% | 4.96% | 7.36% | 6.35% | -1.22% |
MXGMX Great-West U.S. Government Securities Fund | 0.27% | 6.60% | 0.75% | 4.44% | -12.09% | -2.15% | 5.87% | 6.12% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXIHX and MXGMX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MXIHX and MXGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXIHX vs. MXGMX — Risk / Return Rank
MXIHX
MXGMX
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) and Great-West U.S. Government Securities Fund (MXGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXIHX | MXGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.34 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 3.80 | +3.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXIHX drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum MXGMX drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIHX and MXGMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXIHX | MXGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -18.63% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -3.09% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.86% | -6.67% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.51% | -17.09% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -4.36% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -5.31% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 1.07% | -0.57% |
Volatility
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) and Great-West U.S. Government Securities Fund (MXGMX) have volatilities of 1.12% and 1.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXIHX | MXGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.15% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 2.72% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 3.81% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 5.90% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 4.64% | -0.27% |
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXIHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MXGMX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXIHX vs. MXGMX - Dividend Comparison
MXIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than MXGMX's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXGMX Great-West U.S. Government Securities Fund | 2.66% | 2.67% | 2.73% | 2.37% | 1.48% | 2.21% | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.88% | 0.90% |
MXIHX Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund | 3.59% | 3.61% | 3.60% | 4.22% | 8.49% | 3.05% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 4.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXIHX and MXGMX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXGMX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to MXIHX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIHX dropped -11.51% vs MXGMX's -18.63%.
MXIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXIHX and MXGMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer