MXIHX vs. MXLMX
MXIHX (Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund) and MXLMX (Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - MXIHX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Great-West, while MXLMX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 5 years, MXIHX returned 1.17%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for MXLMX. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MXIHX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MXLMX.
Performance
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXIHX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than MXLMX's 0.37% return.
MXIHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.60%
MXLMX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIHX Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund | 0.54% | 6.75% | 2.80% | 4.76% | -8.95% | 4.96% | 7.36% | 6.35% | -1.22% |
MXLMX Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 0.37% | 7.99% | 5.14% | 7.89% | -11.42% | 0.96% | 9.02% | 11.74% | -3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXIHX and MXLMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MXIHX and MXLMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXIHX vs. MXLMX — Risk / Return Rank
MXIHX
MXLMX
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) and Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXIHX | MXLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.26 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.52 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 5.51 | -1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXIHX drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum MXLMX drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIHX and MXLMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXIHX | MXLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -36.94% | +25.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -2.55% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.86% | -3.76% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.51% | -15.52% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -1.09% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -8.18% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.70% | -0.11% |
Volatility
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) is 0.67%, while Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund (MXLMX) has a volatility of 0.80%. This indicates that MXIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXIHX | MXLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.80% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 2.44% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 2.85% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 4.27% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 4.08% | +0.27% |
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXIHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MXLMX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXIHX vs. MXLMX - Dividend Comparison
MXIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than MXLMX's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIHX Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund | 3.59% | 3.61% | 3.60% | 4.22% | 8.49% | 3.05% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 4.31% | 0.00% |
MXLMX Great-West Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.68% | 3.16% | 2.59% | 3.88% | 3.59% | 1.76% | 3.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXIHX and MXLMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXLMX has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to MXIHX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIHX dropped -11.51% vs MXLMX's -36.94%.
MXLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXIHX and MXLMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer