PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAAX vs. BIIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAAX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than BIIPX's 0.61% return.


DFAAX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.44%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*

BIIPX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.09%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
2.44%5.18%4.41%9.49%-13.40%20.47%
BIIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund
0.61%6.05%4.75%3.25%-4.12%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAAX and BIIPX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between DFAAX and BIIPX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAAX vs. BIIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAAX
DFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BIIPX
BIIPX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BIIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BIIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAAXBIIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.39

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

9.93

-4.52

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the BIIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAAX and BIIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAAX drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, which is greater than BIIPX's maximum drawdown of -6.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAAX and BIIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAAXBIIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-6.46%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-1.34%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.44%

-1.34%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-6.46%

-10.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.34%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-1.08%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.32%

+0.40%

Volatility

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio (DFAAX) is 1.00%, while iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that DFAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAAXBIIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.32%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

1.76%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

2.33%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.37%

3.11%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.28%

2.64%

+5.64%

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BIIPX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAAX vs. BIIPX - Dividend Comparison

DFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than BIIPX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund
4.65%4.64%4.30%2.65%4.56%4.39%1.58%2.27%2.74%1.89%
DFAAX
DFA Global Core Plus Real Return Portfolio
3.39%2.90%4.09%3.96%2.06%13.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAAX and BIIPX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIIPX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to DFAAX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAAX dropped -16.64% vs BIIPX's -6.46%.

BIIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAAX and BIIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer