MXI vs. SLX
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) are both Materials funds - MXI tracks the S&P Global Materials Index while SLX tracks the NYSE Arca Steel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for SLX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for SLX.
Performance
MXI vs. SLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than SLX's 19.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has underperformed SLX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while SLX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.83% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
SLX
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- 19.94%
- 6M
- 19.56%
- 1Y
- 60.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
MXI vs. SLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 19.94% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 20.57% | 12.01% | -19.27% | 24.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and SLX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2006 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MXI and SLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXI vs. SLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
SLX
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
MXI
SLX
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
SLX
-
Consumer Defensive
MXI
SLX
-
Industrials
MXI
SLX
Communication Services
MXI
-
SLX
-
Energy
MXI
-
SLX
Financial Services
MXI
-
SLX
-
Healthcare
MXI
-
SLX
-
Real Estate
MXI
-
SLX
-
Technology
MXI
-
SLX
-
Utilities
MXI
-
SLX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. SLX — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
SLX
MXI vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.74 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 12.59 | -5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, smaller than the maximum SLX drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and SLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -82.14% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -16.35% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -27.39% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -33.62% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -61.64% | +22.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -10.38% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -38.63% | +20.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 4.84% | -0.65% |
Volatility
MXI vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) is 8.08%, while VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that MXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 9.40% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 19.29% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 25.19% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 27.84% | -7.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 30.90% | -10.48% |
MXI vs. SLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SLX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than SLX's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.29% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and SLX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to MXI (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs SLX's -82.14%.
On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 18.83% vs 11.38% for MXI. On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for SLX.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.29% for SLX.
MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.56% for SLX.
SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and SLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer