MXI vs. DGRO
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for DGRO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
MXI vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.38%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
MXI vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.19% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and DGRO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MXI and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXI vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
DGRO
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
MXI
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
MXI
DGRO
Industrials
MXI
DGRO
Communication Services
MXI
-
DGRO
Energy
MXI
-
DGRO
Financial Services
MXI
-
DGRO
Healthcare
MXI
-
DGRO
Real Estate
MXI
-
DGRO
-
Technology
MXI
-
DGRO
Utilities
MXI
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
DGRO
MXI vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.45 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 13.31 | -6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -35.10% | -33.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -6.47% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -14.03% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -19.31% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -35.10% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -0.90% | -6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -3.43% | -14.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 1.67% | +2.52% |
Volatility
MXI vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that MXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 2.63% | +5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 6.94% | +11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 9.53% | +11.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 13.80% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 16.60% | +3.82% |
MXI vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than DGRO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.97% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and DGRO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXI has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.62% vs 11.38% for MXI. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.72% for MXI.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer