MXBSX vs. URINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX).
MXBSX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Apr 27, 2016. URINX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jul 30, 2008.
Performance
MXBSX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXBSX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund | -1.35% | 17.70% | 11.16% | 17.79% | -16.61% | 16.82% | 13.96% | 26.31% | -10.30% | 20.41% |
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund | 0.62% | 12.36% | 6.66% | 10.79% | -10.38% | 6.47% | 8.74% | 11.72% | -3.00% | 8.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than URINX's 0.62% return.
MXBSX
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
URINX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXBSX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MXBSX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBSX
URINX
MXBSX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXBSX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.83 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 2.62 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.52 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 10.91 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXBSX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.83 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.73 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.11 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBSX and URINX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXBSX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison
MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than URINX's 6.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund | 5.34% | 5.27% | 7.38% | 5.63% | 10.66% | 11.14% | 6.57% | 9.46% | 8.18% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund | 6.08% | 6.07% | 4.22% | 3.48% | 6.63% | 6.66% | 3.97% | 6.37% | 6.11% | 5.68% | 3.34% | 4.54% |
Drawdowns
MXBSX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and URINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBSX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -15.27% | -16.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -4.41% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.68% | -15.27% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -2.81% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -1.93% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.02% | +1.49% |
Volatility
MXBSX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 2.61%. This indicates that MXBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXBSX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 2.61% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 3.83% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 6.07% | +9.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 6.23% | +9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 5.79% | +10.59% |