PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MWRL.L is traded in GBP, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


MWRL.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WRDA.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MWRL.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWRL.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for MWRL.L.

MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and WRDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer