MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L
MWRL.L (Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating) and BNKE.L (Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MWRL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World, while BNKE.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. MWRL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BNKE.L.
Performance
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MWRL.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNKE.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 41.38%
- 3Y*
- 45.29%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWRL.L
BNKE.L
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWRL.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.74 | — |
Drawdowns
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWRL.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -48.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.25% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.48% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWRL.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.27% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.46% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 29.51% | — |
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKE.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWRL.L vs. BNKE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWRL.L nor BNKE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MWRL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BNKE.L.
MWRL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BNKE.L is Financials Equities. MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while BNKE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.30% for BNKE.L.
Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and BNKE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer