MWRL.L vs. 500G.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

MWRL.L (Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating) and 500G.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MWRL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World, while 500G.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. MWRL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500G.L.

Performance

MWRL.L vs. 500G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MWRL.L is traded in GBP, while 500G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 500G.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

MWRL.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

500G.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MWRL.L vs. 500G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Volatility

MWRL.L vs. 500G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 500G.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MWRL.L vs. 500G.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWRL.L nor 500G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MWRL.L or 500G.L?

On fees, MWRL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MWRL.L or 500G.L?

MWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500G.L.

What is the main difference between MWRL.L and 500G.L?

MWRL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 500G.L is S&P 500. MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while 500G.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.15% for 500G.L.