MWOW.DE vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

MWOW.DE (Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MWOW.DE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MWOW.DE returned 17.14% vs 23.91% for VOO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MWOW.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MWOW.DE is traded in EUR, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOW.DE achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.95% return.

MWOW.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 17.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 10.95%
• 6M: 9.84%
• 1Y: 23.91%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MWOW.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating	2.79%	4.92%	13.88%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.95%	3.84%	8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MWOW.DE and VOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2024	0.59

The correlation between MWOW.DE and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MWOW.DE vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOW.DE

MWOW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 29
MWOW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MWOW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MWOW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MWOW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MWOW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 55
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MWOW.DE	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.92	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.50	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	3.26	-2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	12.20	-8.92

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOW.DE and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOW.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOW.DE and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWOW.DE	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.10%	-33.49%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.64%	-7.37%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.66%	-1.67%	-3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-4.03%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	1.97%	+3.28%

Volatility

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.95%. This indicates that MWOW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MWOW.DE	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	3.95%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.99%	9.12%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.01%	12.51%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.22%	16.76%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.22%	18.55%	+1.67%

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOW.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MWOW.DE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MWOW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MWOW.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.36%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MWOW.DE and VOO in my portfolio?

MWOW.DE and VOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MWOW.DE or VOO?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MWOW.DE or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MWOW.DE.

What is the main difference between MWOW.DE and VOO?

MWOW.DE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MWOW.DE tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MWOW.DE and 0.03% for VOO.