MWA vs. WTS
MWA (Mueller Water Products, Inc.) and WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MWA returned 10.97%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for WTS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MWA vs. WTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWA achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than WTS's 27.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MWA has underperformed WTS with an annualized return of 10.97%, while WTS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.12% annualized return.
MWA
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 9.24%
- 6M
- 4.71%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
WTS
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 15.96%
- YTD
- 27.26%
- 6M
- 24.00%
- 1Y
- 46.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.95%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.12%
MWA vs. WTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 9.24% | 7.01% | 58.45% | 36.27% | -23.81% | 18.06% | 5.45% | 34.32% | -26.09% | -4.59% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 27.26% | 36.85% | -1.62% | 43.57% | -24.08% | 60.63% | 23.14% | 56.20% | -14.13% | 17.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWA and WTS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2006 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MWA and WTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MWA:
$4.08B
WTS:
$11.73B
MWA:
$1.32
WTS:
$10.95
MWA:
19.65
WTS:
31.98
MWA:
0.63
WTS:
1.50
MWA:
2.78
WTS:
4.58
MWA:
3.81
WTS:
5.59
MWA:
$1.46B
WTS:
$2.56B
MWA:
$550.00M
WTS:
$1.26B
MWA:
$311.80M
WTS:
$556.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWA vs. WTS — Risk / Return Rank
MWA
WTS
MWA vs. WTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWA | WTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.05 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 7.88 | -6.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWA vs. WTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWA drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than WTS's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWA and WTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWA | WTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -63.68% | -28.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.55% | -15.45% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -19.54% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.27% | -44.08% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.67% | -44.08% | -2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.52% | 0.00% | -14.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.31% | -16.19% | -24.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.57% | 5.97% | +2.60% |
Volatility
MWA vs. WTS - Volatility Comparison
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWA | WTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 6.59% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.01% | 16.88% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.39% | 23.19% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 27.82% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.22% | 28.26% | +3.96% |
Dividends
MWA vs. WTS - Dividend Comparison
MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than WTS's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 1.07% | 1.14% | 1.15% | 1.72% | 2.18% | 1.55% | 1.72% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 1.28% | 0.83% | 0.91% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 0.63% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.90% | 1.27% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 1.33% |
Financials
MWA vs. WTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mueller Water Products, Inc. and Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MWA vs. WTS - Profitability Comparison
MWA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.50M and revenue of 384.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
WTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
MWA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
WTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.
MWA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 59.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
WTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MWA and WTS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTS has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to MWA (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWA dropped -91.80% vs WTS's -63.68%.
WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MWA and WTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer