MWA vs. AEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MWA (Mueller Water Products, Inc.) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. MWA operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MWA returned 10.40%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for AEM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MWA vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWA achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MWA has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of 10.40%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.

MWA

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -7.28%
• YTD: 6.24%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

AEM

• 1D: -4.07%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 41.42%
• 3Y*: 51.78%
• 5Y*: 22.28%
• 10Y*: 15.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWA vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc.	6.24%	7.01%	58.45%	36.27%	-23.81%	18.06%	5.45%	34.32%	-26.09%	-4.59%
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	1.68%	119.53%	46.04%	8.98%	1.08%	-22.81%	17.39%	54.18%	-11.51%	10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MWA and AEM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2006	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap MWA : $3.96B AEM : $86.12B
EPS MWA : $1.32 AEM : $10.60
PE Ratio MWA : 19.11 AEM : 16.20
PEG Ratio MWA : 0.61 AEM : 0.25
PS Ratio MWA : 2.71 AEM : 6.39
PB Ratio MWA : 3.70 AEM : 3.28
Total Revenue (TTM) MWA : $1.46B AEM : $13.51B
Gross Profit (TTM) MWA : $550.00M AEM : $8.28B
EBITDA (TTM) MWA : $311.80M AEM : $9.72B

Return for Risk

MWA vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWA

MWA Risk / Return Rank: 43
MWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MWA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MWA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

AEM

AEM Risk / Return Rank: 66
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWA vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MWA	AEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	0.97	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.41	-1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.19	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	1.31	-1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.47	3.29	-2.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MWA vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWA and AEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MWA	AEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	0.97	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.61	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.41	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.17	-0.09

Drawdowns

MWA vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWA drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWA and AEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWA	AEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-90.49%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.55%	-31.77%	+13.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.85%	-31.77%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.27%	-46.22%	+4.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.67%	-53.86%	+7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.87%	-31.77%	+14.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.38%	-46.66%	+6.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.96%	12.61%	-4.65%

Volatility

MWA vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is 6.76%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 13.70%. This indicates that MWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MWA	AEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	13.70%	-6.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.64%	34.59%	-16.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.19%	43.02%	-16.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.62%	36.80%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.23%	37.22%	-4.99%

Dividends

MWA vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than AEM's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	0.99%	0.94%	2.05%	2.92%	3.08%	2.63%	2.36%	0.89%	1.09%	0.89%	0.86%	1.22%
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc.	1.10%	1.14%	1.15%	1.72%	2.18%	1.55%	1.72%	1.71%	2.20%	1.28%	0.83%	0.91%

Financials

MWA vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mueller Water Products, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MWA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.50M and revenue of 384.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

MWA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

MWA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 59.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MWA and AEM in my portfolio?

MWA and AEM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MWA or AEM?

AEM has higher volatility (13.70%) compared to MWA (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWA dropped -91.80% vs AEM's -90.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.