PortfoliosLab logo
MWA vs. AEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MWA and AEM is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MWA vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MWA:

0.95

AEM:

2.24

Sortino Ratio

MWA:

1.66

AEM:

2.61

Omega Ratio

MWA:

1.20

AEM:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

MWA:

1.82

AEM:

4.24

Martin Ratio

MWA:

4.69

AEM:

14.30

Ulcer Index

MWA:

7.46%

AEM:

5.26%

Daily Std Dev

MWA:

37.00%

AEM:

34.34%

Max Drawdown

MWA:

-91.80%

AEM:

-90.33%

Current Drawdown

MWA:

-12.90%

AEM:

-4.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MWA:

$3.84B

AEM:

$59.41B

EPS

MWA:

$0.91

AEM:

$4.70

PE Ratio

MWA:

26.96

AEM:

25.10

PEG Ratio

MWA:

1.34

AEM:

28.15

PS Ratio

MWA:

2.80

AEM:

6.66

PB Ratio

MWA:

4.41

AEM:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

MWA:

$1.37B

AEM:

$8.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MWA:

$473.30M

AEM:

$4.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

MWA:

$263.20M

AEM:

$5.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWA achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 52.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MWA has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of 11.73%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.


MWA

YTD

9.59%

1M

-7.39%

6M

-1.53%

1Y

33.64%

3Y*

29.19%

5Y*

23.30%

10Y*

11.73%

AEM

YTD

52.01%

1M

5.18%

6M

40.83%

1Y

76.00%

3Y*

34.23%

5Y*

15.96%

10Y*

15.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Mueller Water Products, Inc.

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MWA vs. AEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MWA is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MWA is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MWA is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MWA is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MWA is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MWA is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEM is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEM is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEM is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEM is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MWA vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWA and AEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MWA vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than AEM's 1.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MWA
Mueller Water Products, Inc.
1.08%1.15%1.72%2.18%1.55%1.73%1.72%2.20%1.28%0.83%0.91%0.70%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.36%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%

Drawdowns

MWA vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWA drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWA and AEM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MWA vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is 13.27%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that MWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MWA vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mueller Water Products, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
364.30M
2.47B
(MWA) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MWA vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mueller Water Products, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
35.1%
52.0%
(MWA) Gross Margin
(AEM) Gross Margin
MWA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 128.00M and revenue of 364.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

MWA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 69.90M and revenue of 364.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

MWA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 364.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 814.73M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.