MWA vs. VPG
MWA (Mueller Water Products, Inc.) and VPG (Vishay Precision Group, Inc.) are both stocks. MWA operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while VPG operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MWA returned 10.36%/yr vs 25.90%/yr for VPG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MWA vs. VPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWA achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than VPG's 245.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MWA has underperformed VPG with an annualized return of 10.36%, while VPG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.90% annualized return.
MWA
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
VPG
- 1D
- 5.30%
- 1M
- 120.74%
- YTD
- 245.27%
- 6M
- 279.91%
- 1Y
- 430.24%
- 3Y*
- 54.95%
- 5Y*
- 31.31%
- 10Y*
- 25.90%
MWA vs. VPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 5.82% | 7.01% | 58.45% | 36.27% | -23.81% | 18.06% | 5.45% | 34.32% | -26.09% | -4.59% |
VPG Vishay Precision Group, Inc. | 245.27% | 64.04% | -31.11% | -11.85% | 4.12% | 17.92% | -7.41% | 12.47% | 20.20% | 33.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWA and VPG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
MWA:
$3.95B
VPG:
$1.77B
MWA:
$1.32
VPG:
$0.44
MWA:
19.03
VPG:
299.01
MWA:
2.70
VPG:
5.53
MWA:
3.69
VPG:
5.28
MWA:
$1.46B
VPG:
$319.82M
MWA:
$550.00M
VPG:
$125.26M
MWA:
$311.80M
VPG:
$23.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWA vs. VPG — Risk / Return Rank
MWA
VPG
MWA vs. VPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) and Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWA | VPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 6.87 | -6.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 5.76 | -5.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.75 | -0.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 15.21 | -15.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 41.84 | -41.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWA | VPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 6.87 | -6.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.70 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.63 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.41 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
MWA vs. VPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWA drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than VPG's maximum drawdown of -60.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWA and VPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWA | VPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -60.04% | -31.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.55% | -27.40% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -49.86% | +24.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.27% | -57.69% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.67% | -60.04% | +13.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.20% | 0.00% | -17.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.39% | -24.23% | -16.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.89% | 9.96% | -2.07% |
Volatility
MWA vs. VPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is 6.71%, while Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) has a volatility of 32.04%. This indicates that MWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWA | VPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 32.04% | -25.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.65% | 50.55% | -32.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 63.22% | -37.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 44.76% | -14.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 41.60% | -9.36% |
Dividends
MWA vs. VPG - Dividend Comparison
MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while VPG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.15% | 1.72% | 2.18% | 1.55% | 1.72% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 1.28% | 0.83% | 0.91% |
VPG Vishay Precision Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MWA vs. VPG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mueller Water Products, Inc. and Vishay Precision Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MWA vs. VPG - Profitability Comparison
MWA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.50M and revenue of 384.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
VPG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.87M and revenue of 84.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
MWA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
VPG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 340.00K and revenue of 84.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
MWA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 59.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
VPG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a net income of -319.00K and revenue of 84.35M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MWA and VPG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPG has higher volatility (32.04%) compared to MWA (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWA dropped -91.80% vs VPG's -60.04%.
VPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.87 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MWA and VPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer