PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVV vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 13.68%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.


MVV

1D
1.75%
1M
6.05%
YTD
26.09%
6M
27.71%
1Y
48.71%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
13.68%

SSO

1D
0.27%
1M
10.52%
YTD
21.07%
6M
21.28%
1Y
56.67%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.39%
10Y*
24.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
26.09%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%48.57%6.20%49.50%-25.44%30.81%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
21.07%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and SSO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.88

The correlation between MVV and SSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVV vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVV
SSO

Industrials

25.1%
8.3%

Technology

15.8%
35.6%

Financial Services

14.3%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.5%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.9%

Energy

5.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.9%

Utilities

3.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

1.0%
11.2%

Industrials

MVV
25.1%
SSO
8.3%

Technology

MVV
15.8%
SSO
35.6%

Financial Services

MVV
14.3%
SSO
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MVV
10.6%
SSO
10.1%

Healthcare

MVV
8.7%
SSO
8.5%

Real Estate

MVV
7.5%
SSO
1.9%

Energy

MVV
5.5%
SSO
3.5%

Basic Materials

MVV
4.8%
SSO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

MVV
3.7%
SSO
4.9%

Utilities

MVV
3.1%
SSO
2.4%

Communication Services

MVV
1.0%
SSO
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVV vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVVSSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

2.42

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.03

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.21

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

14.14

-4.76

MVV vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVVSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.42

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.61

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.42

-0.16

Drawdowns

MVV vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVVSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-84.67%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.68%

-18.17%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.80%

-35.21%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

-46.73%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-59.34%

-9.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-19.57%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.13%

+1.01%

Volatility

MVV vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.46%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVVSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

5.46%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.69%

17.74%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.22%

23.57%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.64%

33.65%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.37%

35.90%

+6.47%

MVV vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVV vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than SSO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.67%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.61%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVV and SSO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVV has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to SSO (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.38% vs 13.68% for MVV. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVV.

MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.

MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVV and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer