MVV vs. SSO
MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - MVV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVV returned 13.68%/yr vs 24.38%/yr for SSO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
MVV vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 13.68%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 48.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
SSO
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 21.07%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 56.67%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.39%
- 10Y*
- 24.38%
MVV vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 26.09% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 21.07% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and SSO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.88 |
The correlation between MVV and SSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MVV vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVV
SSO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MVV
SSO
Technology
MVV
SSO
Financial Services
MVV
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
MVV
SSO
Healthcare
MVV
SSO
Real Estate
MVV
SSO
Energy
MVV
SSO
Basic Materials
MVV
SSO
Consumer Defensive
MVV
SSO
Utilities
MVV
SSO
Communication Services
MVV
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
SSO
MVV vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 2.42 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 3.03 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 3.21 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 14.14 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.42 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.61 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.42 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -84.67% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -18.17% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.80% | -35.21% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -46.73% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -59.34% | -9.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.55% | -19.57% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 4.13% | +1.01% |
Volatility
MVV vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.46%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 5.46% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.69% | 17.74% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.22% | 23.57% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.64% | 33.65% | +5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.37% | 35.90% | +6.47% |
MVV vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVV vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than SSO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVV and SSO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVV has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to SSO (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.38% vs 13.68% for MVV. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVV.
MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.
MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVV and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer