MVV vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MVV returned 17.50%/yr vs -31.54%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. MVV charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

MVV vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 23.84% return.

MVV

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -1.31%
• 6M: 15.28%
• YTD: 26.87%
• 1Y: 33.29%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

BITI

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -2.41%
• 6M: 34.02%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 1Y: 64.31%
• 3Y*: -31.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	26.87%	3.48%	17.75%	22.51%	14.80%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	23.84%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and BITI is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.38

Return for Risk

MVV vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV

MVV Risk / Return Rank: 40
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVV	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.46	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	2.03	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	2.56	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	6.37	+0.07

MVV vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVV vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVV	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	-92.16%	+6.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.68%	-25.28%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.80%	-84.63%	+39.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.21%	-86.48%	+82.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.45%	-68.36%	+47.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	10.13%	-4.94%

Volatility

MVV vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 7.34%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVV	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	11.73%	-4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.41%	34.49%	-11.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.83%	44.24%	-12.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.62%	52.29%	-12.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.26%	52.29%	-10.03%

MVV vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVV vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than BITI's 15.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.70%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	0.68%	0.77%	0.39%	0.77%	0.93%	0.16%	0.29%	0.62%	0.62%	0.21%	0.43%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVV and BITI in my portfolio?

MVV and BITI have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVV or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to MVV (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, MVV or BITI?

On 3-year performance, MVV leads with 17.50% vs -31.54% for BITI. On fees, MVV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVV or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, MVV has performed better with a 17.50% return vs -31.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVV or BITI?

MVV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVV or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.70%, compared with 0.68% for MVV.

What is the main difference between MVV and BITI?

MVV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.