PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVRL vs. MTUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVRL vs. MTUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVRL achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than MTUL's 60.22% return.


MVRL

1D
-2.09%
1M
-7.86%
YTD
-5.20%
6M
-5.45%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
-8.72%
10Y*

MTUL

1D
-0.74%
1M
27.97%
YTD
60.22%
6M
59.66%
1Y
75.85%
3Y*
59.49%
5Y*
19.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVRL vs. MTUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
-5.20%14.96%-3.45%12.30%-42.41%14.07%
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
60.22%27.42%58.70%10.66%-37.97%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MVRL and MTUL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between MVRL and MTUL has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVRL vs. MTUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVRL
MVRL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MVRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVRL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUL
MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVRL vs. MTUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVRLMTULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

3.20

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

12.78

-11.19

MVRL vs. MTUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the MTUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVRL and MTUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVRLMTULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.73

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.47

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.41

-0.29

Drawdowns

MVRL vs. MTUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVRL drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than MTUL's maximum drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVRL and MTUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVRLMTULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.25%

-56.83%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-23.86%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.20%

-39.15%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.25%

-56.83%

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.93%

-0.74%

-39.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.81%

-22.68%

-9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

5.96%

+1.55%

Volatility

MVRL vs. MTUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) is 5.87%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that MVRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVRLMTULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

20.29%

-14.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

37.63%

-17.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

43.98%

-16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.55%

42.81%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.63%

43.65%

-6.02%

MVRL vs. MTUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVRL and MTUL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

MVRL vs. MTUL - Dividend Comparison

MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.21%, while MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
21.21%19.15%19.27%18.69%25.21%12.33%5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVRL and MTUL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUL has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to MVRL (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVRL dropped -60.25% vs MTUL's -56.83%.

On 5-year performance, MTUL leads with 19.95% vs -8.72% for MVRL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVRL has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 19.95% return vs -8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MVRL and MTUL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 21.21%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

MVRL is categorized as REIT, while MTUL is Momentum. MVRL tracks MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index (150%), while MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index.

MTUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVRL and MTUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer