MTUL vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MTUL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUL is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MTUL returned 59.11%/yr vs 19.79%/yr for JEPQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTUL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUL achieves a 66.24% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.85% return.

MTUL

• 1D: -6.87%
• 1M: 15.33%
• YTD: 66.24%
• 6M: 59.30%
• 1Y: 84.36%
• 3Y*: 59.11%
• 5Y*: 20.69%
• 10Y*: —

JEPQ

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 7.02%
• 1Y: 25.10%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	66.24%	27.42%	58.70%	10.66%	-7.36%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.85%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUL and JEPQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022	0.78

The correlation between MTUL and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTUL vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUL

MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 63
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTUL	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.93	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.57	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	2.86	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.96	13.55	+0.41

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUL and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUL drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUL and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUL	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.83%	-20.07%	-36.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.86%	-8.82%	-15.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.15%	-20.07%	-19.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.87%	-2.48%	-4.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-3.40%	-19.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.06%	1.86%	+4.20%

Volatility

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a higher volatility of 21.95% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 6.27%. This indicates that MTUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUL	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.95%	6.27%	+15.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.49%	10.58%	+29.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.37%	13.08%	+34.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.49%	16.79%	+26.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.11%	16.79%	+27.32%

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTUL vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.22%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTUL and JEPQ in my portfolio?

MTUL and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTUL or JEPQ?

MTUL has higher volatility (21.95%) compared to JEPQ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUL dropped -56.83% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

Which ETF is better, MTUL or JEPQ?

On 3-year performance, MTUL leads with 59.11% vs 19.79% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTUL or JEPQ?

Over the 3-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 59.11% return vs 19.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTUL or JEPQ?

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MTUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTUL or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

What is the main difference between MTUL and JEPQ?

MTUL is categorized as Momentum, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MTUL and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.