PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVCAX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MVCAX having a 11.24% return and VMFVX slightly higher at 11.63%. Over the past 10 years, MVCAX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.


MVCAX

1D
0.87%
1M
2.80%
YTD
11.24%
6M
9.74%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.43%

VMFVX

1D
0.86%
1M
2.73%
YTD
11.63%
6M
9.75%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
11.24%6.09%13.57%12.51%-8.96%30.43%4.03%30.57%-11.69%13.37%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.63%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MVCAX and VMFVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.96

The correlation between MVCAX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVCAX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVCAX
MVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVCAXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.98

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

6.83

-0.23

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVCAX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCAX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVCAXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-45.79%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-10.52%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-22.46%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-22.46%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-45.79%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.37%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-5.46%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.04%

-0.29%

Volatility

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVCAXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.95%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

10.71%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

15.25%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

19.42%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

21.85%

-2.62%

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVCAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVCAX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

MVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than VMFVX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
7.38%8.21%10.99%2.73%5.22%5.70%0.80%2.03%6.36%3.36%0.07%4.59%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.69%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MVCAX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFVX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to MVCAX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVCAX dropped -60.41% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVCAX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer