PortfoliosLab logo
MVCAX vs. FLMVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVCAX and FLMVX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MVCAX vs. FLMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MVCAX:

0.22

FLMVX:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

MVCAX:

0.41

FLMVX:

0.65

Omega Ratio

MVCAX:

1.05

FLMVX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

MVCAX:

0.17

FLMVX:

0.34

Martin Ratio

MVCAX:

0.53

FLMVX:

1.08

Ulcer Index

MVCAX:

6.84%

FLMVX:

5.86%

Daily Std Dev

MVCAX:

18.71%

FLMVX:

17.20%

Max Drawdown

MVCAX:

-59.47%

FLMVX:

-54.19%

Current Drawdown

MVCAX:

-9.38%

FLMVX:

-8.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVCAX achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than FLMVX's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MVCAX has outperformed FLMVX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while FLMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.


MVCAX

YTD

-2.12%

1M

4.71%

6M

-9.28%

1Y

4.08%

3Y*

6.18%

5Y*

13.46%

10Y*

8.02%

FLMVX

YTD

-1.44%

1M

2.72%

6M

-8.08%

1Y

7.43%

3Y*

5.89%

5Y*

13.52%

10Y*

7.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS Mid Cap Value Fund

JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund

MVCAX vs. FLMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVCAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMVX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVCAX vs. FLMVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVCAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVCAX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLMVX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVCAX vs. FLMVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the FLMVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVCAX and FLMVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MVCAX vs. FLMVX - Dividend Comparison

MVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, less than FLMVX's 12.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
11.22%10.98%2.73%5.22%5.70%0.80%2.04%6.36%3.36%1.18%4.59%6.61%
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
12.33%12.15%6.10%11.73%14.98%7.73%5.20%8.30%2.71%7.04%6.69%8.60%

Drawdowns

MVCAX vs. FLMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVCAX drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than FLMVX's maximum drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCAX and FLMVX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MVCAX vs. FLMVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) at 4.65%. This indicates that MVCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...