MVCAX vs. FGSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX).
MVCAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Aug 31, 2001. FGSAX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Aug 23, 1984.
Performance
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVCAX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 1.03% | 6.09% | 13.57% | 12.51% | -8.96% | 30.43% | 4.03% | 30.57% | -11.69% | 13.37% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -6.56% | 10.54% | 32.97% | 27.05% | -24.60% | 22.39% | 35.50% | 27.95% | -3.23% | 24.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVCAX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than FGSAX's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MVCAX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
MVCAX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
FGSAX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVCAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MVCAX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank
MVCAX
FGSAX
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVCAX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 0.97 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 2.04 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVCAX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.62 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.47 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between MVCAX and FGSAX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison
MVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than FGSAX's 5.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVCAX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 8.12% | 8.21% | 10.99% | 2.73% | 5.22% | 5.70% | 0.80% | 2.03% | 6.36% | 3.36% | 0.07% | 4.59% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 5.27% | 4.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 25.75% | 7.07% | 8.13% | 14.46% | 13.93% | 0.89% | 25.34% |
Drawdowns
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCAX and FGSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVCAX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.41% | -66.17% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.55% | -13.73% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -35.79% | +14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | -37.19% | -5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -10.89% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -16.19% | +8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 4.41% | -0.96% |
Volatility
MVCAX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) is 5.22%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that MVCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MVCAX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 6.50% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 14.19% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 20.64% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 22.43% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 22.32% | -3.07% |