PortfoliosLab logo
MVCAX vs. FASEX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVCAX and FASEX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MVCAX vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MVCAX:

0.22

FASEX:

0.14

Sortino Ratio

MVCAX:

0.41

FASEX:

0.25

Omega Ratio

MVCAX:

1.05

FASEX:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

MVCAX:

0.17

FASEX:

0.07

Martin Ratio

MVCAX:

0.53

FASEX:

0.22

Ulcer Index

MVCAX:

6.84%

FASEX:

7.15%

Daily Std Dev

MVCAX:

18.71%

FASEX:

20.06%

Max Drawdown

MVCAX:

-59.47%

FASEX:

-55.57%

Current Drawdown

MVCAX:

-9.38%

FASEX:

-9.91%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MVCAX having a -2.12% return and FASEX slightly lower at -2.14%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MVCAX having a 8.02% annualized return and FASEX not far behind at 7.96%.


MVCAX

YTD

-2.12%

1M

4.71%

6M

-9.28%

1Y

4.08%

3Y*

6.18%

5Y*

13.46%

10Y*

8.02%

FASEX

YTD

-2.14%

1M

4.03%

6M

-9.69%

1Y

2.77%

3Y*

4.43%

5Y*

13.94%

10Y*

7.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS Mid Cap Value Fund

Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund

MVCAX vs. FASEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVCAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FASEX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVCAX vs. FASEX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVCAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVCAX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FASEX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FASEX is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FASEX is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FASEX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FASEX is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FASEX is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FASEX is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVCAX vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the FASEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVCAX and FASEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MVCAX vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison

MVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than FASEX's 5.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
11.22%10.98%2.73%5.22%5.70%0.80%2.04%6.36%3.36%1.18%4.59%6.61%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
5.41%5.30%3.12%6.32%5.24%1.05%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%0.84%

Drawdowns

MVCAX vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVCAX drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than FASEX's maximum drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCAX and FASEX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MVCAX vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) at 5.07%. This indicates that MVCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...