PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVCAX vs. COSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVCAX achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than COSIX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MVCAX has outperformed COSIX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while COSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.31% annualized return.


MVCAX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.88%
6M
9.41%
YTD
13.27%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
10.05%

COSIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.27%
6M
0.85%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*
3.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
13.27%6.09%13.57%12.51%-8.96%30.43%4.03%30.57%-11.69%13.37%
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
1.17%6.98%4.50%9.86%-11.65%1.34%7.12%10.19%-0.96%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MVCAX and COSIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.19

Over the past year, MVCAX and COSIX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVCAX vs. COSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVCAX
MVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

COSIX
COSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
COSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
COSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) and Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVCAXCOSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.81

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.26

7.06

-0.79

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the COSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVCAX and COSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than COSIX's maximum drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCAX and COSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVCAXCOSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-27.69%

-32.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-2.21%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-4.17%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-16.88%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-16.88%

-25.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.64%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-2.46%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

0.57%

+2.17%

Volatility

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) at 0.81%. This indicates that MVCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVCAXCOSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

0.81%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

2.28%

+7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

2.88%

+10.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

4.57%

+12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

4.15%

+15.03%

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVCAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than COSIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVCAX vs. COSIX - Dividend Comparison

MVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than COSIX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
5.02%4.94%5.20%5.03%3.56%3.86%3.24%3.71%4.25%3.51%3.09%4.20%
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
7.24%8.21%10.99%2.73%5.22%5.70%0.80%2.03%6.36%3.36%0.07%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVCAX and COSIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVCAX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to COSIX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVCAX dropped -60.41% vs COSIX's -27.69%.

COSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVCAX and COSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer