PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSIX vs. TTRZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSIX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than TTRZX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, COSIX has outperformed TTRZX with an annualized return of 3.56%, while TTRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.07% annualized return.


COSIX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
3.56%

TTRZX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.94%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
1.63%6.98%4.50%9.86%-11.65%1.34%7.12%10.19%-0.96%5.48%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
1.92%18.26%-6.61%6.28%-12.29%-5.14%-5.58%2.01%2.03%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between COSIX and TTRZX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2008

0.42

Over the past year, COSIX and TTRZX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSIX vs. TTRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSIX
COSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
COSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
COSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

TTRZX
TTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSIXTTRZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.29

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

4.29

+4.60

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the TTRZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSIX and TTRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSIX drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, smaller than the maximum TTRZX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSIX and TTRZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSIXTTRZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-33.17%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-6.95%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-11.49%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

-26.45%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.88%

-33.17%

+16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-8.74%

+8.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-7.61%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

2.08%

-1.51%

Volatility

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) is 0.82%, while Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that COSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSIXTTRZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

2.03%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

6.26%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

7.49%

-4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

9.23%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

7.91%

-3.74%

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than TTRZX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSIX vs. TTRZX - Dividend Comparison

COSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than TTRZX's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
4.97%4.94%5.20%5.03%3.56%3.86%3.24%3.71%4.25%3.51%3.09%4.20%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
6.95%5.57%8.19%5.95%7.54%8.18%4.84%6.96%5.55%3.54%2.94%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSIX and TTRZX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTRZX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to COSIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSIX dropped -27.69% vs TTRZX's -33.17%.

COSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSIX and TTRZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer