MVBF vs. CVS
MVBF (MVB Financial Corp.) and CVS (CVS Health Corporation) are both stocks. MVBF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CVS operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, MVBF returned 9.93%/yr vs 3.94%/yr for CVS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MVBF vs. CVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVBF achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than CVS's 29.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MVBF has outperformed CVS with an annualized return of 9.93%, while CVS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return.
MVBF
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 39.24%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
CVS
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 29.83%
- 6M
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 57.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
MVBF vs. CVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVBF MVB Financial Corp. | 8.82% | 28.74% | -5.15% | 5.68% | -45.83% | 85.48% | -7.02% | 39.64% | -9.72% | 57.82% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 29.83% | 84.35% | -40.77% | -12.53% | -7.63% | 54.87% | -5.14% | 17.26% | -7.04% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVBF and CVS is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2008 | 0.13 |
The correlation between MVBF and CVS shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MVBF:
$2.06
CVS:
$2.30
MVBF:
13.47
CVS:
44.01
MVBF:
1.85
CVS:
0.32
MVBF:
$196.04M
CVS:
$407.91B
MVBF:
$119.39M
CVS:
$56.59B
MVBF:
$39.01M
CVS:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVBF vs. CVS — Risk / Return Rank
MVBF
CVS
MVBF vs. CVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVBF | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.53 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 9.08 | -3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVBF vs. CVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVBF drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, which is greater than CVS's maximum drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVBF and CVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVBF | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -64.07% | -11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -16.44% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.66% | -43.98% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.85% | -56.79% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.71% | -56.79% | -6.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.07% | -0.65% | -28.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -19.53% | -15.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 6.38% | +0.80% |
Volatility
MVBF vs. CVS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) is 7.34%, while CVS Health Corporation (CVS) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that MVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVBF | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 7.77% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.27% | 25.91% | -5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 31.27% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.70% | 30.01% | +4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.07% | 29.34% | +10.73% |
Dividends
MVBF vs. CVS - Dividend Comparison
MVBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than CVS's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 2.63% | 3.35% | 5.93% | 3.06% | 2.36% | 1.94% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.76% | 2.15% | 1.43% |
MVBF MVB Financial Corp. | 2.45% | 2.63% | 3.29% | 3.01% | 3.09% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 0.78% | 0.61% | 0.37% | 0.62% | 0.31% |
Financials
MVBF vs. CVS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MVB Financial Corp. and CVS Health Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MVBF vs. CVS - Profitability Comparison
MVBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 37.10M and revenue of 56.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.
CVS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 100.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
MVBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 5.45M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.
CVS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported an operating income of 4.68B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
MVBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a net income of 4.23M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
CVS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a net income of 2.94B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MVBF and CVS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVS has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to MVBF (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVBF dropped -75.98% vs CVS's -64.07%.
CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVBF and CVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer