MVBF vs. MTN
MVBF (MVB Financial Corp.) and MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. MVBF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while MTN operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MVBF returned 9.63%/yr vs 3.06%/yr for MTN. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MVBF vs. MTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVBF achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than MTN's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MVBF has outperformed MTN with an annualized return of 9.63%, while MTN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.06% annualized return.
MVBF
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- -1.72%
- 1Y
- 39.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- -6.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
MTN
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- -8.71%
- 3Y*
- -14.88%
- 5Y*
- -13.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.06%
MVBF vs. MTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVBF MVB Financial Corp. | 3.80% | 28.74% | -5.15% | 5.68% | -45.83% | 85.48% | -7.02% | 39.64% | -9.72% | 57.82% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 2.54% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVBF and MTN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2008 | 0.14 |
The correlation between MVBF and MTN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MVBF:
$2.06
MTN:
$9.55
MVBF:
12.85
MTN:
14.02
MVBF:
1.44
MTN:
0.34
MVBF:
1.77
MTN:
1.11
MVBF:
$196.04M
MTN:
$2.92B
MVBF:
$119.39M
MTN:
$1.73B
MVBF:
$39.01M
MTN:
$417.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVBF vs. MTN — Risk / Return Rank
MVBF
MTN
MVBF vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVBF | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | -0.33 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | -0.60 | +6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVBF | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | -0.26 | +1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | -0.42 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.10 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.21 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
MVBF vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVBF drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MTN drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVBF and MTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVBF | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.98% | -77.54% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -26.40% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.66% | -46.41% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.87% | -61.17% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.71% | -61.17% | -2.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.34% | -56.32% | +23.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -26.11% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.11% | 14.64% | -7.53% |
Volatility
MVBF vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) is 6.58%, while Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that MVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVBF | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 7.10% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 26.27% | -5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 33.69% | -6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 31.71% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.06% | 32.29% | +7.77% |
Dividends
MVBF vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison
MVBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than MTN's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.63% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
MVBF MVB Financial Corp. | 2.57% | 2.63% | 3.29% | 3.01% | 3.09% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 0.78% | 0.61% | 0.37% | 0.62% | 0.31% |
Financials
MVBF vs. MTN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MVB Financial Corp. and Vail Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MVBF vs. MTN - Profitability Comparison
MVBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 37.10M and revenue of 56.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.6%.
MVBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 5.45M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 345.05M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.8%.
MVBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a net income of 4.23M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 210.01M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MVBF and MTN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTN has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to MVBF (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVBF dropped -75.98% vs MTN's -77.54%.
MVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVBF and MTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer