PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVBF vs. MTN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MVBF vs. MTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVBF achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than MTN's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MVBF has outperformed MTN with an annualized return of 10.13%, while MTN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.53% annualized return.


MVBF

1D
1.77%
1M
10.28%
YTD
10.74%
6M
9.89%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
-6.03%
10Y*
10.13%

MTN

1D
0.51%
1M
11.57%
YTD
9.05%
6M
3.33%
1Y
-4.38%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-11.79%
10Y*
3.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVBF vs. MTN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
10.74%28.74%-5.15%5.68%-45.83%85.48%-7.02%39.64%-9.72%57.82%
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
9.05%-24.88%-7.96%-7.06%-24.89%18.15%17.77%17.34%1.74%34.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MVBF and MTN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2008

0.14

The correlation between MVBF and MTN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MVBF:

$2.06

MTN:

$5.62

PE Ratio

MVBF:

13.71

MTN:

25.34

PEG Ratio

MVBF:

1.53

MTN:

0.62

PS Ratio

MVBF:

1.88

MTN:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

MVBF:

$196.04M

MTN:

$2.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MVBF:

$119.39M

MTN:

$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

MVBF:

$39.01M

MTN:

$499.82M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVBF vs. MTN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVBF
MVBF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MTN
MTN Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVBF vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVBFMTNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.01

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

-0.17

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

-0.29

+5.61

MVBF vs. MTN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVBF Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the MTN Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVBF and MTN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVBF vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVBF drawdown since its inception was -75.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MTN drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVBF and MTN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVBFMTNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.98%

-77.54%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

-26.40%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.66%

-45.73%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.80%

-61.17%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.71%

-61.17%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.82%

-53.55%

+25.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-26.20%

-8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

15.07%

-7.89%

Volatility

MVBF vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) is 7.39%, while Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) has a volatility of 14.71%. This indicates that MVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVBFMTNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

14.71%

-7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

27.60%

-7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

36.00%

-8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.71%

32.30%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.07%

32.56%

+7.51%

Dividends

MVBF vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison

MVBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than MTN's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
6.24%6.69%4.74%3.86%3.21%0.54%0.63%2.94%2.79%1.98%2.01%1.95%
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
2.41%2.63%3.29%3.01%3.09%1.23%1.59%0.78%0.61%0.37%0.62%0.31%

Financials

MVBF vs. MTN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MVB Financial Corp. and Vail Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
56.35M
1.21B
(MVBF) Total Revenue
(MTN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MVBF vs. MTN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MVB Financial Corp. and Vail Resorts, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
65.8%
95.3%
Portfolio components
MVBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 37.10M and revenue of 56.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.

MTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

MVBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 5.45M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

MTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.

MVBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a net income of 4.23M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

MTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MVBF and MTN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTN has higher volatility (14.71%) compared to MVBF (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVBF dropped -75.98% vs MTN's -77.54%.

MVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVBF and MTN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer