MUSQ vs. HTEC
MUSQ (MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUSQ is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MUSQ returned -0.43%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for HTEC. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MUSQ charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUSQ achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly lower than HTEC's 8.91% return.
MUSQ
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- -8.84%
- 3Y*
- -0.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.00%
HTEC
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 38.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $648.14K | $1.29M | $661.96K | |
| $161.63K | $82.87K | $43.23K |
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF | -12.75% | 19.60% | -4.94% | 0.81% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 8.91% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSQ and HTEC is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MUSQ and HTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MUSQ
HTEC
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
MUSQ
HTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
MUSQ
HTEC
-
Technology
MUSQ
HTEC
Industrials
MUSQ
HTEC
Basic Materials
MUSQ
-
HTEC
Consumer Defensive
MUSQ
-
HTEC
-
Energy
MUSQ
-
HTEC
Financial Services
MUSQ
-
HTEC
Healthcare
MUSQ
-
HTEC
Real Estate
MUSQ
-
HTEC
-
Utilities
MUSQ
-
HTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUSQ vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
MUSQ
HTEC
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUSQ | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.31 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 2.40 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 5.75 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUSQ | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -57.53% | +34.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.11% | -16.31% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.11% | -25.25% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.60% | -25.08% | +6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -28.95% | +21.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 6.80% | +4.59% |
Volatility
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 5.00%. This indicates that MUSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUSQ | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 5.00% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 16.46% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 21.21% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 24.64% | -6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 25.43% | -7.35% |
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUSQ vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than HTEC's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF | 0.72% | 0.63% | 1.08% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUSQ and HTEC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUSQ has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to HTEC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSQ dropped -23.11% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 3-year performance, HTEC leads with 8.78% vs -0.43% for MUSQ. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HTEC has performed better with a 8.78% return vs -0.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for MUSQ.
HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.72% for MUSQ.
MUSQ is categorized as Communications Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.68% for HTEC.
HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUSQ and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer