PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSQ vs. EMQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSQ achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -14.82% return.


MUSQ

1D
-4.84%
1M
-4.32%
6M
-11.21%
YTD
-12.75%
1Y
-8.84%
3Y*
-0.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.00%

EMQQ

1D
1.06%
1M
7.64%
6M
-13.01%
YTD
-14.82%
1Y
-12.02%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
-7.26%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
3.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.08M$1.15M$1.71M
$161.63K$82.87K$43.23K

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
-12.75%19.60%-4.94%0.81%
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-14.82%20.66%13.79%7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSQ and EMQQ is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023

0.62

The correlation between MUSQ and EMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MUSQ
EMQQ

Communication Services

77.3%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
33.1%

Technology

10.6%
7.5%

Industrials

0.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.2%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.6%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Communication Services

MUSQ
77.3%
EMQQ
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MUSQ
11.5%
EMQQ
33.1%

Technology

MUSQ
10.6%
EMQQ
7.5%

Industrials

MUSQ
0.6%
EMQQ
1.1%

Basic Materials

MUSQ

-

EMQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

MUSQ

-

EMQQ
0.2%

Energy

MUSQ

-

EMQQ

-

Financial Services

MUSQ

-

EMQQ
3.6%

Healthcare

MUSQ

-

EMQQ
0.0%

Real Estate

MUSQ

-

EMQQ
2.7%

Utilities

MUSQ

-

EMQQ
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSQ vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MUSQ
MUSQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MUSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSQEMQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.91

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.39

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-0.70

-0.24

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is comparable to the EMQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSQ and EMQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and EMQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSQEMQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-73.24%

+50.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

-33.70%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.11%

-33.70%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.60%

-55.12%

+36.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-31.71%

+24.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

18.96%

-7.57%

Volatility

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison

MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) at 5.14%. This indicates that MUSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSQEMQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.14%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

17.04%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

21.16%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

32.74%

-14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

30.58%

-12.50%

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUSQ vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison

MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than EMQQ's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.63%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
0.72%0.63%1.08%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUSQ and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUSQ has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to EMQQ (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSQ dropped -23.11% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.

On 3-year performance, EMQQ leads with 3.09% vs -0.43% for MUSQ. On fees, MUSQ is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMQQ has performed better with a 3.09% return vs -0.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUSQ is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.72% for MUSQ.

MUSQ is categorized as Communications Equities, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.86% for EMQQ.

MUSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSQ and EMQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer