MUSI vs. QINT
MUSI (American Century Multisector Income ETF) and QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. MUSI is actively managed, while QINT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MUSI returned 6.54%/yr vs 20.37%/yr for QINT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUSI charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for QINT.
Performance
MUSI vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUSI achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 8.57% return.
MUSI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QINT
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 25.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
MUSI vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSI American Century Multisector Income ETF | 0.85% | 8.32% | 5.14% | 7.51% | -10.33% | 0.60% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 8.57% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSI and QINT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MUSI and QINT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUSI vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank
MUSI
QINT
MUSI vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUSI | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.22 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 8.95 | -2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUSI vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSI drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSI and QINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUSI | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -33.86% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | -11.41% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.16% | -13.56% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -2.47% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -7.50% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 2.83% | -2.02% |
Volatility
MUSI vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI) is 1.05%, while American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that MUSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUSI | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 5.26% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 13.09% | -10.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.37% | 15.42% | -12.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 16.33% | -11.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 18.08% | -13.24% |
MUSI vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUSI has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than QINT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUSI vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
MUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than QINT's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSI American Century Multisector Income ETF | 5.53% | 5.74% | 6.00% | 5.20% | 4.02% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 3.81% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUSI and QINT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QINT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to MUSI (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSI dropped -13.91% vs QINT's -33.86%.
On 3-year performance, QINT leads with 20.37% vs 6.54% for MUSI. On fees, MUSI is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MUSI has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QINT has performed better with a 20.37% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MUSI is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
MUSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 3.81% for QINT.
MUSI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while QINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MUSI and 0.39% for QINT.
QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUSI and QINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer