MUSE vs. DIG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MUSE (TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - MUSE is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW, while DIG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). MUSE is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. Over the past year, MUSE returned 7.21% vs 68.08% for DIG. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MUSE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.

Performance

MUSE vs. DIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSE achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 57.02% return.

MUSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 2.26%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 1Y: 7.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIG

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.49%
• 6M: 39.50%
• YTD: 57.02%
• 1Y: 68.08%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 33.20%
• 10Y*: 3.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSE vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	2.92%	8.25%	0.34%
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas	57.02%	2.73%	-17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSE and DIG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MUSE and DIG has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

MUSE vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSE

MUSE Risk / Return Rank: 85
MUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
MUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DIG

DIG Risk / Return Rank: 53
DIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DIG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
DIG Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSE vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUSE	DIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	1.64	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	2.10	+1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.26	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.30	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.58	5.96	+4.62

MUSE vs. DIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the DIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSE and DIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUSE vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSE drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSE and DIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSE	DIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-97.04%	+93.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-29.80%	+27.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-54.00%	+54.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-64.31%	+63.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	11.46%	-10.78%

Volatility

MUSE vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is 0.47%, while ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) has a volatility of 12.34%. This indicates that MUSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSE	DIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	12.34%	-11.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.45%	33.38%	-30.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84%	41.89%	-39.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	51.35%	-47.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	57.79%	-54.02%

MUSE vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUSE vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison

MUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than DIG's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas	1.58%	2.62%	3.13%	0.61%	1.33%	2.24%	3.18%	2.72%	2.30%	1.76%	1.09%	1.56%
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	7.70%	7.35%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSE and DIG in my portfolio?

MUSE and DIG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSE or DIG?

DIG has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to MUSE (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSE dropped -3.63% vs DIG's -97.04%.

Which ETF is better, MUSE or DIG?

On 1-year performance, DIG leads with 68.08% vs 7.21% for MUSE. On fees, MUSE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, MUSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUSE or DIG?

Over the 1-year period, DIG has performed better with a 68.08% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUSE or DIG?

MUSE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUSE or DIG?

MUSE has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 1.58% for DIG.

What is the main difference between MUSE and DIG?

MUSE is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DIG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MUSE and 0.95% for DIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.