MUSE vs. DIAL
MUSE (TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF) and DIAL (Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. MUSE is actively managed, while DIAL is passively managed. Over the past year, MUSE returned 9.59% vs 9.01% for DIAL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUSE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DIAL.
Performance
MUSE vs. DIAL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MUSE having a 1.09% return and DIAL slightly higher at 1.10%.
MUSE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 9.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIAL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
MUSE vs. DIAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF | 1.09% | 8.25% | 0.34% |
DIAL Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF | 1.10% | 9.93% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSE and DIAL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MUSE and DIAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUSE vs. DIAL — Risk / Return Rank
MUSE
DIAL
MUSE vs. DIAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUSE | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 2.30 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.21 | 3.43 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.43 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 2.97 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.32 | 13.14 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUSE | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.30 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.75 | 0.36 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
MUSE vs. DIAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSE drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, smaller than the maximum DIAL drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSE and DIAL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUSE | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -22.19% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -3.34% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.67% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -5.61% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.76% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MUSE vs. DIAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is 1.43%, while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that MUSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUSE | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 1.94% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 2.82% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 3.96% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 7.00% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 7.06% | -3.08% |
MUSE vs. DIAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUSE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DIAL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUSE vs. DIAL - Dividend Comparison
MUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than DIAL's 4.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF | 7.60% | 7.35% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIAL Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF | 4.80% | 4.81% | 4.67% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.46% | 2.61% | 3.27% | 3.56% | 0.65% |