MUNDX vs. LVAFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MUNDX (Mundoval Fund) and LVAFX (LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MUNDX returned 11.44%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for LVAFX. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MUNDX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LVAFX.

Performance

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNDX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MUNDX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.15% annualized return.

MUNDX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 3.71%
• YTD: 5.47%
• 1Y: 26.55%
• 3Y*: 11.44%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 11.44%
• ALL TIME*: 8.21%

LVAFX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.72%
• 6M: 12.90%
• YTD: 17.34%
• 1Y: 29.64%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 8.15%
• ALL TIME*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MUNDX Mundoval Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUNDX Mundoval Fund	5.47%	18.06%	11.13%	15.75%	-18.38%	22.91%	14.85%	37.23%	-8.29%	18.86%
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund	17.34%	22.33%	0.10%	9.81%	-4.04%	17.36%	-5.16%	17.54%	-6.47%	18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNDX and LVAFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.74

The correlation between MUNDX and LVAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MUNDX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MUNDX

MUNDX Risk / Return Rank: 65
MUNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MUNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MUNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
MUNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MUNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

LVAFX

LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 97
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUNDX	LVAFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	3.40	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	4.99	-2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.64	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	5.01	-3.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.60	17.92	-10.32

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNDX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNDX drawdown since its inception was -93.89%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNDX and LVAFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUNDX	LVAFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.89%	-33.69%	-60.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.19%	-5.76%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.89%	-17.52%	-76.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.89%	-18.34%	-75.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.89%	-33.69%	-60.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.17%	0.00%	-91.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-4.71%	-10.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	1.61%	+1.57%

Volatility

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 1.99%. This indicates that MUNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUNDX	LVAFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	1.99%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	6.55%	+4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	8.51%	+4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	489.18%	13.24%	+475.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	345.87%	13.53%	+332.34%

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNDX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUNDX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

MUNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, less than LVAFX's 8.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund	8.67%	10.17%	2.71%	15.64%	2.90%	2.90%	2.14%	7.62%	3.59%	7.10%	1.66%	1.74%
MUNDX Mundoval Fund	8.19%	8.63%	7.29%	3.10%	2.88%	4.56%	4.85%	0.52%	0.24%	0.19%	0.50%	3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUNDX and LVAFX in my portfolio?

MUNDX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUNDX or LVAFX?

MUNDX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to LVAFX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNDX dropped -93.89% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.