PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNDX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNDX achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 20.55% return.


MUNDX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.37%
YTD
4.48%
6M
6.74%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
11.61%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
11.96%

GCCHX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
20.55%
6M
23.60%
1Y
68.14%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUNDX
Mundoval Fund
4.48%18.06%11.13%15.75%-18.38%22.91%14.85%37.23%-8.29%12.50%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
20.55%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNDX and GCCHX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017

0.66

The correlation between MUNDX and GCCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNDX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNDX
MUNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MUNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUNDXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

4.99

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

15.52

-7.49

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNDX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNDX drawdown since its inception was -93.89%, which is greater than GCCHX's maximum drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNDX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNDXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.89%

-54.32%

-39.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-11.76%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.89%

-52.03%

-41.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.89%

-54.32%

-39.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.26%

-6.43%

-84.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-13.87%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.87%

-0.72%

Volatility

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mundoval Fund (MUNDX) is 4.08%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that MUNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNDXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

9.25%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

17.65%

-7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

24.53%

-11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

488.98%

27.13%

+461.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

345.94%

25.21%

+320.73%

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNDX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNDX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

MUNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than GCCHX's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.25%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%0.00%0.00%
MUNDX
Mundoval Fund
8.26%8.63%7.29%3.10%2.88%4.56%4.85%0.52%0.24%0.19%0.50%3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNDX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to MUNDX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNDX dropped -93.89% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNDX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer