MUL.L vs. NBIS
MUL.L (Mulberry Group plc) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. MUL.L operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, MUL.L returned 48.11% vs 317.53% for NBIS. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MUL.L is traded in GBp, while NBIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NBIS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUL.L achieves a 30.48% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 160.87% return.
MUL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 27.44%
- YTD
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- -18.56%
- 5Y*
- -14.46%
- 10Y*
- -17.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.73%
NBIS
- 1D
- 19.14%
- 1M
- -25.32%
- 6M
- 119.40%
- YTD
- 160.87%
- 1Y
- 317.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 295.49%
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MUL.L Mulberry Group plc | 30.48% | -3.23% | -14.90% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 160.87% | 180.66% | 52.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUL.L and NBIS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.00 |
Fundamentals
MUL.L:
£96.12M
NBIS:
$52.06B
MUL.L:
-£0.83
NBIS:
$3.08
MUL.L:
0.37
NBIS:
67.03
MUL.L:
£257.42M
NBIS:
$877.90M
MUL.L:
£162.49M
NBIS:
$420.60M
MUL.L:
-£22.50M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUL.L vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
MUL.L
NBIS
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mulberry Group plc (MUL.L) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUL.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.38 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 6.92 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 15.10 | -8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUL.L drawdown since its inception was -96.48%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUL.L and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUL.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.48% | -59.36% | -37.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -46.25% | +31.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.98% | -25.32% | -68.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.09% | -19.20% | -41.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.09% | 21.14% | -14.05% |
Volatility
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mulberry Group plc (MUL.L) is 2.74%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 37.50%. This indicates that MUL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUL.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 37.50% | -34.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 77.04% | -58.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.45% | 107.88% | -78.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.42% | 111.10% | -61.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.54% | 111.10% | -58.56% |
Dividends
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MUL.L nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUL.L Mulberry Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.69% | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.53% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MUL.L vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mulberry Group plc and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MUL.L and NBIS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MUL.L and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer