MUL.L vs. AMDL
MUL.L (Mulberry Group plc) is a stock, while AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, MUL.L returned 13.95% vs 884.50% for AMDL. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUL.L vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MUL.L is traded in GBp, while AMDL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMDL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUL.L achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 264.53% return.
MUL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- -21.54%
- 5Y*
- -16.89%
- 10Y*
- -18.71%
AMDL
- 1D
- -21.09%
- 1M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- 264.53%
- 6M
- 242.81%
- 1Y
- 884.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUL.L vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MUL.L Mulberry Group plc | 16.67% | -3.23% | -11.43% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 264.53% | 88.54% | -69.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUL.L and AMDL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUL.L vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
MUL.L
AMDL
MUL.L vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mulberry Group plc (MUL.L) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUL.L | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.57 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 15.77 | -15.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 30.68 | -29.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUL.L | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 6.86 | -6.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.34 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
MUL.L vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUL.L drawdown since its inception was -96.48%, which is greater than AMDL's maximum drawdown of -88.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUL.L and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUL.L | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.48% | -88.67% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -56.66% | +36.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -26.68% | -67.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.52% | -49.71% | -10.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.38% | 29.07% | -16.69% |
Volatility
MUL.L vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mulberry Group plc (MUL.L) is 10.46%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 44.28%. This indicates that MUL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUL.L | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 44.28% | -33.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 96.04% | -76.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.84% | 130.47% | -98.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.43% | 116.21% | -65.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.58% | 116.21% | -63.63% |
Dividends
MUL.L vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither MUL.L nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUL.L Mulberry Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.69% | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUL.L and AMDL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MUL.L and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer