PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUJ vs. DNYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUJ achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than DNYMX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MUJ has outperformed DNYMX with an annualized return of 2.59%, while DNYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.34% annualized return.


MUJ

1D
0.74%
1M
1.35%
YTD
5.41%
6M
4.83%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
2.59%

DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.41%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.98%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MUJ and DNYMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.22

The correlation between MUJ and DNYMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUJ vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUJDNYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

4.18

-2.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

12.55

-10.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

56.41

-48.03

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the DNYMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUJ and DNYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUJDNYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

4.63

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

1.82

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

1.28

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.33

-0.98

Drawdowns

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUJ drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, which is greater than DNYMX's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUJ and DNYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUJDNYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-3.19%

-38.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-0.24%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.17%

-0.98%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-2.53%

-30.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-3.19%

-29.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

0.00%

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-0.42%

-8.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.05%

+2.27%

Volatility

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.20%. This indicates that MUJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUJDNYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

0.20%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

0.49%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.84%

0.65%

+8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.35%

0.88%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.20%

1.05%

+10.15%

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUJ has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DNYMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUJ vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison

MUJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than DNYMX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.28%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUJ and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to DNYMX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUJ dropped -41.72% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUJ and DNYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer