PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNYMX vs. FHMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNYMX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than FHMIX's 1.11% return.


DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%

FHMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.37%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.98%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.18%
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
1.11%3.09%1.19%0.32%0.00%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DNYMX and FHMIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNYMX vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FHMIX
FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNYMXFHMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.63

3.19

+1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

10.39

11.49

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.18

5.69

-1.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.63

28.50

-15.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

56.98

77.58

-20.60

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNYMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the FHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNYMX and FHMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNYMXFHMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

3.19

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.82

1.45

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Drawdowns

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNYMX drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNYMX and FHMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNYMXFHMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-0.50%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-0.10%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-0.50%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.53%

-0.50%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.06%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.04%

+0.01%

Volatility

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison

DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) have volatilities of 0.22% and 0.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNYMXFHMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.21%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.49%

0.61%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

0.89%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.88%

0.79%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.05%

0.79%

+0.26%

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNYMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DNYMX vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison

DNYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FHMIX's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
2.80%3.04%1.18%0.32%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNYMX and FHMIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNYMX has higher volatility (0.22%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNYMX dropped -3.19% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNYMX and FHMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer