PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUJ vs. PCDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund (PCDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUJ achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than PCDIX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MUJ has outperformed PCDIX with an annualized return of 2.43%, while PCDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.


MUJ

1D
-0.81%
1M
1.18%
YTD
5.53%
6M
4.05%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
2.43%

PCDIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.53%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%
PCDIX
PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund
0.93%5.00%3.12%3.59%-2.41%0.16%1.75%2.96%1.35%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MUJ and PCDIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2006

0.21

The correlation between MUJ and PCDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUJ vs. PCDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PCDIX
PCDIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PCDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PCDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund (PCDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUJPCDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

2.30

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.90

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

13.20

-4.75

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the PCDIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUJ and PCDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUJ drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, which is greater than PCDIX's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUJ and PCDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUJPCDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-4.52%

-37.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-1.02%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.17%

-1.66%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-4.52%

-28.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-4.52%

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-0.14%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-0.43%

-8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

0.30%

+2.04%

Volatility

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund (PCDIX) at 0.35%. This indicates that MUJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUJPCDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

0.35%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

0.91%

+6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.99%

1.22%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

1.69%

+8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.20%

1.56%

+9.64%

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUJ has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PCDIX's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUJ vs. PCDIX - Dividend Comparison

MUJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than PCDIX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.30%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%
PCDIX
PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund
2.83%3.80%3.38%2.25%1.16%1.07%1.23%1.79%1.55%1.27%1.02%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUJ and PCDIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to PCDIX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUJ dropped -41.72% vs PCDIX's -4.52%.

PCDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUJ and PCDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer