PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNYMX vs. NYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNYMX vs. NYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNYMX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than NYF's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DNYMX has underperformed NYF with an annualized return of 1.34%, while NYF has yielded a comparatively higher 1.81% annualized return.


DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%

NYF

1D
0.15%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.55%
6M
2.00%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNYMX vs. NYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.98%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
1.55%3.64%1.13%5.76%-7.75%1.34%4.18%6.49%0.66%5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DNYMX and NYF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between DNYMX and NYF has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNYMX vs. NYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NYF
NYF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNYMX vs. NYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNYMXNYFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.63

2.47

+2.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

10.39

3.54

+6.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.18

1.54

+2.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.63

2.42

+10.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

56.98

8.71

+48.28

DNYMX vs. NYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNYMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the NYF Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNYMX and NYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNYMXNYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

2.47

+2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.82

0.21

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

0.41

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.47

+0.86

Drawdowns

DNYMX vs. NYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNYMX drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum NYF drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNYMX and NYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNYMXNYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-13.12%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-2.76%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-5.68%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.53%

-12.71%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.19%

-13.12%

+9.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-2.31%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.77%

-0.72%

Volatility

DNYMX vs. NYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) is 0.22%, while iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that DNYMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNYMXNYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.95%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.49%

2.08%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

2.79%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.88%

4.00%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.05%

4.48%

-3.43%

DNYMX vs. NYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DNYMX and NYF have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DNYMX vs. NYF - Dividend Comparison

DNYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than NYF's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
3.09%2.99%2.77%2.36%2.04%1.85%1.98%2.19%2.48%2.46%2.43%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNYMX and NYF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NYF has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to DNYMX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNYMX dropped -3.19% vs NYF's -13.12%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNYMX and NYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer