DNYMX vs. DCARX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX).
DNYMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 15, 2015. DCARX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Oct 31, 2017.
Performance
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNYMX DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.57% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 2.76% | -1.17% | -0.10% | 1.26% | 2.42% | 1.02% | 0.27% |
DCARX DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 1.09% | 2.64% | 3.16% | 2.63% | -1.06% | 6.21% | 2.35% | 5.08% | -0.46% | 1.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNYMX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than DCARX's 1.09% return.
DNYMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
DCARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNYMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DCARX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DNYMX vs. DCARX — Risk / Return Rank
DNYMX
DCARX
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNYMX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | 2.06 | +1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.88 | 2.97 | +1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.61 | 1.57 | +1.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.99 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.17 | 12.16 | +8.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNYMX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 2.06 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.73 | 1.20 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.93 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between DNYMX and DCARX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Dividend Comparison
DNYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than DCARX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNYMX DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.74% | 2.36% | 2.73% | 1.92% | 0.70% | 0.59% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.04% | 1.08% |
DCARX DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 3.41% | 3.11% | 3.52% | 1.84% | 0.90% | 0.78% | 1.12% | 1.43% | 1.27% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNYMX drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum DCARX drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNYMX and DCARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNYMX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -12.27% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.89% | -0.93% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.53% | -4.79% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.24% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -0.76% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.14% | 0.23% | -0.09% |
Volatility
DNYMX vs. DCARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) is 0.21%, while DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that DNYMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DNYMX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.51% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.44% | 0.71% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96% | 1.28% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 2.25% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 2.93% | -1.87% |