MUD vs. TMF
MUD (Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). MUD is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. Over the past year, MUD returned -93.46% vs -16.31% for TMF. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MUD charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
MUD vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUD achieves a -80.35% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -14.03% return.
MUD
- 1D
- -7.66%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -69.73%
- YTD
- -80.35%
- 1Y
- -93.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -80.86%
TMF
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -12.77%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 1Y
- -16.31%
- 3Y*
- -18.25%
- 5Y*
- -34.57%
- 10Y*
- -18.16%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.35M | $166.22M | $199.88M | |
| $176.74M | $135.76M | $128.72M |
MUD vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares | -80.35% | -78.75% | 19.12% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -14.03% | -2.94% | -21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUD and TMF is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUD vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
MUD
TMF
MUD vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.61 | 0.92 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.57 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -1.14 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUD vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, roughly equal to the maximum TMF drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.03% | -93.10% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.56% | -28.69% | -65.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.38% | -92.88% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -44.09% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.10% | 14.30% | +56.80% |
Volatility
MUD vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) has a higher volatility of 33.65% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.86%. This indicates that MUD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.65% | 7.86% | +25.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.44% | 20.07% | +50.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.08% | 27.12% | +53.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.63% | 46.38% | +27.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.63% | 43.70% | +29.93% |
MUD vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUD vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.46%, more than TMF's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares | 12.46% | 9.21% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.59% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUD and TMF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUD has higher volatility (33.65%) compared to TMF (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUD dropped -97.03% vs TMF's -93.10%.
On 1-year performance, TMF leads with -16.31% vs -93.46% for MUD. On fees, MUD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.31% return vs -93.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MUD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
MUD has the higher dividend yield at 12.46%, compared with 4.59% for TMF.
MUD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MUD and 1.01% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUD and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer