PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUB vs. FLTMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUB vs. FLTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than FLTMX's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MUB has underperformed FLTMX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while FLTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.18% annualized return.


MUB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.92%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.01%

FLTMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.26%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUB vs. FLTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
1.41%3.78%1.26%5.56%-7.34%1.02%5.12%7.06%0.93%4.72%
FLTMX
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
0.90%6.02%1.19%5.52%-6.92%0.83%4.36%6.34%1.89%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MUB and FLTMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2007

0.56

The correlation between MUB and FLTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUB vs. FLTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTMX
FLTMX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUB vs. FLTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUBFLTMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.72

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.08

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

6.57

+2.17

MUB vs. FLTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FLTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUB and FLTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUBFLTMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.71

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.42

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.68

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.36

-0.78

Drawdowns

MUB vs. FLTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum FLTMX drawdown of -16.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and FLTMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUBFLTMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-16.13%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.97%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-3.88%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.88%

-10.91%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.68%

-10.91%

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-1.09%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-1.64%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.94%

-0.15%

Volatility

MUB vs. FLTMX - Volatility Comparison

iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) at 0.88%. This indicates that MUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUBFLTMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.88%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

1.81%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

2.28%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

3.05%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

3.24%

+1.68%

MUB vs. FLTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTMX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUB vs. FLTMX - Dividend Comparison

MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than FLTMX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTMX
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
2.88%3.70%2.47%2.42%1.36%1.67%2.00%2.39%3.31%2.64%3.20%2.36%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.17%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUB and FLTMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUB has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FLTMX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUB dropped -13.68% vs FLTMX's -16.13%.

FLTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUB and FLTMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer