MUB vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
MUB and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2007. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both MUB and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MUB or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between MUB and BND is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
MUB vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MUB:
0.14
BND:
1.33
MUB:
0.21
BND:
1.93
MUB:
1.03
BND:
1.23
MUB:
0.14
BND:
0.52
MUB:
0.47
BND:
3.43
MUB:
1.40%
BND:
2.05%
MUB:
4.74%
BND:
5.31%
MUB:
-13.68%
BND:
-18.84%
MUB:
-3.19%
BND:
-6.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MUB has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 1.88%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.
MUB
-1.61%
-0.85%
-1.27%
1.04%
1.04%
1.88%
BND
2.74%
0.14%
1.94%
7.37%
-0.83%
1.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MUB vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MUB
BND
MUB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MUB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than BND's 3.69% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% | 2.73% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.69% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
MUB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MUB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 2.19%. This indicates that MUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.