PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTMX vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTMX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than VTEB's 1.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLTMX having a 2.17% annualized return and VTEB not far behind at 2.10%.


FLTMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.26%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
2.17%

VTEB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.95%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTMX
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
0.81%6.02%1.19%5.52%-6.92%0.83%4.36%6.34%1.89%4.50%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.52%3.72%1.31%6.15%-7.99%1.14%5.19%7.35%1.04%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTMX and VTEB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2015

0.65

The correlation between FLTMX and VTEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTMX vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTMX
FLTMX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FLTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTMXVTEBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

2.64

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

3.92

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.58

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.58

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

9.21

-2.69

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTMX and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTMXVTEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.64

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.24

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.40

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.48

+0.89

Drawdowns

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTMX drawdown since its inception was -16.13%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTMX and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTMXVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.13%

-17.00%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-2.71%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-5.53%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.91%

-12.64%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.91%

-17.00%

+6.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.46%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-2.33%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.76%

+0.17%

Volatility

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTMXVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.90%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

2.03%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

2.72%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.05%

3.90%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

5.26%

-2.02%

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTMX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTMX vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

FLTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than VTEB's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTMX
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
2.88%3.70%2.47%2.42%1.36%1.67%2.00%2.39%3.31%2.64%3.20%2.36%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.35%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTMX and VTEB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTEB has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to FLTMX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTMX dropped -16.13% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

VTEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTMX and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer