PortfoliosLab logo
FLTMX vs. RVNU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLTMX and RVNU is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
26.42%
35.24%
FLTMX
RVNU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLTMX:

0.29

RVNU:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

FLTMX:

0.44

RVNU:

-0.21

Omega Ratio

FLTMX:

1.07

RVNU:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

FLTMX:

0.33

RVNU:

-0.13

Martin Ratio

FLTMX:

1.12

RVNU:

-0.51

Ulcer Index

FLTMX:

1.13%

RVNU:

3.30%

Daily Std Dev

FLTMX:

3.97%

RVNU:

8.28%

Max Drawdown

FLTMX:

-23.31%

RVNU:

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

FLTMX:

-1.83%

RVNU:

-9.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTMX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than RVNU's -3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX has underperformed RVNU with an annualized return of 1.89%, while RVNU has yielded a comparatively higher 2.28% annualized return.


FLTMX

YTD

-0.42%

1M

2.16%

6M

-0.36%

1Y

1.17%

5Y*

1.34%

10Y*

1.89%

RVNU

YTD

-3.00%

1M

2.53%

6M

-4.29%

1Y

-1.72%

5Y*

0.59%

10Y*

2.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTMX vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTMX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLTMX vs. RVNU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLTMX is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

RVNU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RVNU is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RVNU is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RVNU is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RVNU is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RVNU is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RVNU is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLTMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTMX and RVNU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.29
-0.21
FLTMX
RVNU

Dividends

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

FLTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than RVNU's 3.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLTMX
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
2.50%2.65%2.43%2.05%1.80%2.06%2.39%2.55%2.61%2.61%2.59%2.81%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.32%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%3.15%

Drawdowns

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTMX drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, roughly equal to the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTMX and RVNU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.83%
-9.62%
FLTMX
RVNU

Volatility

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) is 1.94%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that FLTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.94%
3.23%
FLTMX
RVNU