FLTMX vs. RVNU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLTMX (Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX returned 2.18%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for RVNU. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTMX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.

Performance

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTMX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX has outperformed RVNU with an annualized return of 2.18%, while RVNU has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.

FLTMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

RVNU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	0.90%	6.02%	1.19%	5.52%	-6.92%	0.83%	4.36%	6.34%	1.89%	4.50%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.71%	0.58%	1.46%	11.19%	-16.60%	2.28%	6.54%	10.16%	-0.56%	8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTMX and RVNU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013	0.46

The correlation between FLTMX and RVNU shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLTMX vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTMX

FLTMX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FLTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 63
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLTMX	RVNU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	1.89	+0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.16	2.83	+1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.36	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	3.92	-1.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	11.69	-5.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTMX and RVNU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLTMX	RVNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	1.89	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	-0.03	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.26	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.39	+0.97

Drawdowns

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTMX drawdown since its inception was -16.13%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTMX and RVNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLTMX	RVNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.13%	-23.51%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-2.46%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.88%	-10.35%	+6.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.91%	-23.51%	+12.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.91%	-23.51%	+12.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-2.80%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-4.98%	+3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.83%	+0.11%

Volatility

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) is 0.89%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that FLTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLTMX	RVNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.89%	1.42%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	3.41%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	5.12%	-2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.05%	7.19%	-4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.24%	7.27%	-4.03%

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTMX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLTMX vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

FLTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than RVNU's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	2.88%	3.70%	2.47%	2.42%	1.36%	1.67%	2.00%	2.39%	3.31%	2.64%	3.20%	2.36%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.52%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLTMX and RVNU in my portfolio?

FLTMX and RVNU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLTMX or RVNU?

RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FLTMX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTMX dropped -16.13% vs RVNU's -23.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.