PortfoliosLab logo
FLTMX vs. FSTFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLTMX and FSTFX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLTMX vs. FSTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
388.99%
255.54%
FLTMX
FSTFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLTMX:

0.29

FSTFX:

1.33

Sortino Ratio

FLTMX:

0.44

FSTFX:

1.82

Omega Ratio

FLTMX:

1.07

FSTFX:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

FLTMX:

0.33

FSTFX:

1.51

Martin Ratio

FLTMX:

1.12

FSTFX:

5.69

Ulcer Index

FLTMX:

1.13%

FSTFX:

0.53%

Daily Std Dev

FLTMX:

3.97%

FSTFX:

2.26%

Max Drawdown

FLTMX:

-23.31%

FSTFX:

-7.34%

Current Drawdown

FLTMX:

-1.83%

FSTFX:

-0.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTMX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FSTFX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX has outperformed FSTFX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while FSTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return.


FLTMX

YTD

-0.42%

1M

2.16%

6M

-0.36%

1Y

1.17%

5Y*

1.34%

10Y*

1.89%

FSTFX

YTD

0.73%

1M

1.26%

6M

0.81%

1Y

3.03%

5Y*

1.34%

10Y*

1.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTMX vs. FSTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTMX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTFX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLTMX vs. FSTFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLTMX is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLTMX is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSTFX is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSTFX is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSTFX is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSTFX is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSTFX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSTFX is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLTMX vs. FSTFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLTMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the FSTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTMX and FSTFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.29
1.33
FLTMX
FSTFX

Dividends

FLTMX vs. FSTFX - Dividend Comparison

FLTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than FSTFX's 1.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLTMX
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
2.50%2.65%2.43%2.05%1.80%2.06%2.39%2.55%2.61%2.61%2.59%2.81%
FSTFX
Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
1.92%2.02%1.69%1.38%1.26%1.59%1.75%1.64%1.50%1.47%1.60%1.91%

Drawdowns

FLTMX vs. FSTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTMX drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, which is greater than FSTFX's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTMX and FSTFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.83%
-0.76%
FLTMX
FSTFX

Volatility

FLTMX vs. FSTFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) at 1.02%. This indicates that FLTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.94%
1.02%
FLTMX
FSTFX