MU vs. XEMD
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, MU returned 149.71%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for XEMD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 243.32% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD's 3.09% return.
MU
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 183.94%
- YTD
- 243.32%
- 1Y
- 687.66%
- 3Y*
- 149.71%
- 5Y*
- 66.39%
- 10Y*
- 54.18%
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 10.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 243.32% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -10.21% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 3.09% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and XEMD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
MU
XEMD
MU vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.42 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.23 | 2.90 | +20.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 83.25 | 12.99 | +70.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -10.01% | -88.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -3.52% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -4.31% | -53.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.29% | -0.38% | -18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.07% | -1.24% | -56.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 0.79% | +7.64% |
Volatility
MU vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 1.26%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | 1.26% | +32.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.19% | 3.77% | +58.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.68% | 4.71% | +70.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.75% | 6.84% | +47.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 6.84% | +43.81% |
Dividends
MU vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than XEMD's 5.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.78% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and XEMD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to XEMD (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs XEMD's -10.01%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer