PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MU vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 55.03%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


MU

1D
9.87%
1M
27.11%
YTD
232.74%
6M
284.77%
1Y
776.52%
3Y*
144.94%
5Y*
65.39%
10Y*
55.03%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
232.74%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and VEA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.50

The correlation between MU and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.32

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.90

2.42

+23.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

100.37

9.39

+90.99

MU vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 11.44, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44

1.75

+9.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.55

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.59

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.24

+0.07

Drawdowns

MU vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-60.68%

-37.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-11.63%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-13.45%

-44.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-29.71%

-27.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-35.73%

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.07%

-3.40%

-8.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

-13.29%

-44.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

3.00%

+4.80%

Volatility

MU vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.16%

6.03%

+28.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.74%

13.91%

+42.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.70%

16.15%

+52.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.91%

16.63%

+36.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.99%

17.40%

+32.59%

Dividends

MU vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


MU and VEA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs VEA's -60.68%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer