MU vs. VEA
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 55.03%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for VEA. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MU vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 55.03%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
MU vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and VEA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.50 |
The correlation between MU and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
MU
VEA
MU vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.32 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.90 | 2.42 | +23.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 100.37 | 9.39 | +90.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44 | 1.75 | +9.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.55 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 0.59 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.24 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
MU vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -60.68% | -37.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -11.63% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -13.45% | -44.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -29.71% | -27.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -35.73% | -21.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -3.40% | -8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -13.29% | -44.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 3.00% | +4.80% |
Volatility
MU vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.16% | 6.03% | +28.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.74% | 13.91% | +42.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 16.15% | +52.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.91% | 16.63% | +36.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.99% | 17.40% | +32.59% |
Dividends
MU vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and VEA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs VEA's -60.68%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer